THE MAN IN THIS PICTURE IS JEAN-LOUIS LEZORAINE OWNER OF OVOCONCEPT-SARL IN FRANCE BEWARE HE IS A FRENCH THIEVING CUNT THAT OWES ME A LOT OF MONEY BEWARE IF YOU ARE THINKING OF DOING BUSINESS WITH HIM OR OVOCONCEPT-SARL.





THIS WEEK IS THE BFREPA CONFERENCE AT THE NATIONAL BIKE MUSEUM ON WEDS 23RD.

THIS IS A WARNING IF YOU VISIT THE OVOCONCEPT-SARL STAND.

I AM OWED A LOT OF MONEY FROM THEM JUST READ THE CONTENT ON THIS SITE.

ONLY RECENTLY I TRIED VERY HARD TO COME TO A SOLUTION WITH THEM, AS A GESTURE OF GOOD WILL I TOOK THIS WEBSITE OFF-LINE.

ONLY TO BE DISMISSED BY JEAN-LOUIS LEZORAINE.

THEY STILL OWE ME MONEY.

THEY ARE NO BETTER THAN THIEVES, BE WARNED.

THIEVES ATTENDING THE CONFERENCE PASSING OFF AS OVOCONCEPT-SARL.

DON'T LOSE MONEY LIKE I HAVE.






8TH SEPTEMBER 2016

SO JEAN-LOUIS YOU MUST HAVE HAD A GOOD HOLIDAY AND ARE BACK AT WORK BY NOW.

DID THE MONIES YOU OWE ME STRETCH TO PAYING FOR THIS YEARS HOLIDAY?

IT IS VERY CLEAR FOR THE WHOLE WORLD TO SEE THAT YOU A STILL HIDING FROM THE TRUTH AND YOU STILL OWE ME THE MONEY.

CLEARLY NOT A MAN OR COMPANY TO DO BUSINESS WITH.

IN PLAIN ENGLISH YOU AND OVOCONCEPT- SARL ARE NOTHING BUT THIEFS AND CHEATS OR YOUR WOULD HAVE REFUNDED WHAT IS RIGHTFULLY OUR MONEY.

YOUR LAST LAWYERS LETTER, REALLY SCARED US, AND I'M STILL WAITING FOR THE FRENCH POLICE TO TURN UP IN ENGLAND, SO WE CAN GIVE A STATEMENT ON YOUR ACTIONS.







11TH JULY 2016

HAVING ATTENDED THE PIG & POULTRY SHOW IN MAY, I HAVE GIVEN OVOCONCEPT AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESOLVE THIS DISPUTE AND REPAY THE MONEY THAT IS OWED TO ME.

HOWEVER ALL THAT HAS HAPPENED IS JEAN-LOUIS HAS HID BEHIND HIS SOLICITOR AND SENT A LETTER INFORMING ME THAT I'M THREATENING THEM AND I'VE BEEN REPORTED TO THE FRENCH POLICE. (THE LETTER IS PUBLISHED BELOW FOR THE WORLD TO SEE.)

SO IT'S TIME TO MAKE THIS VERY CLEAR JEAN-LOUIS AND OVOCONCEPT-SARL OF FRANCE.

YOU OWE MONIES TO ME, IT IS NOT A CRIME TO ASK FOR THAT MONEY BACK ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU HAVE ADMITTED THAT YOU OWE THE MONEY.

ALL YOUR THREATS FROM YOUR SOLICITORS AND BARRISTERS HAVE NOT COME TO ANYTHING.

SIMPLY BECAUSE, IT IS NOT A CRIME TO ASK FOR MY MONEY BACK,OR BRING THIS DISPUTE TO A WIDER AUDIENCE. IT IS ONLY FAIR TO INFORM PEOPLE THAT MAY WISH TO TRADE WITH YOUR COMPANY WHAT RISK'S THEY MAY BE TAKING WITH THEIR MONEY.

I BELEIVE YOU COULD HAVE SORTED THIS OUT VERY EARLY ON, BUT CHOSE NOT TO. SO I HAVE COME TO THE OPINION THAT THIS WAS A DELIBERATE ACT ON YOUR PART.

I BELIEVE THAT YOU CHOSE TO WITH HOLD MY MONEY AND NOT REFUND ME.

SO ON THAT BASIS, I BELEIVE YOU ARE NO MORE THAN A CHEAT AND FRAUD.

WHEN I ATTENDED THE PIG & POULTRY SHOW I WAS NOT REMOVED BY THE SHOW STAFF AS YOU CLAIM AND YOUR STAFF CELINE ROUSSEAU ACTUALLY STATED THAT YOU WERE PREPARED AND WANTED TO BUY THE COMPLETE EGG PROCESSING LINE BACK FROM ME.

THAT IS WHY I HAVE WAITED UNTILL NOW TO SEE IF SHE WAS TELLING THE TRUTH.

OBVERSELY NOT.

WITH ALL THE LIES THAT HAVE COME FROM YOUR SIDE, IT WOULD NOT BE WRONG FOR ME TO TELL THE WORLD BECAUSE: 

IF I WAS WRONG TAKING THIS ACTION AND YOU COULD TAKE LEGAL ACTION TO PREVENT ME YOU AND YOUR LAWYERS WOULD HAVE.

THAT IS NOT THE CASE, SO I MUST BE RIGHT- YOU OWE ME MONEY.

I STATED CLEARLY AT THE SHOW THAT I COULD AND WOULD ATTEND TRADE SHOWS YOU ATTEND ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD. 

YES I CAN, IT IS NOT A CRIME TO DO SO AND I WILL.

I CAN CONTINUE TO PROMOTE THIS WEBSITE AND BRING TO THE WORLD MY BELIEF, THAT YOU STILL OWE ME MONEY.

IT'S CLEARLY NOT A CRIME.

IF YOU WERE TO TAKE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST ME, AS YOU HAVE THREATEN ON MORE THAN ONE OCCASION, COULD YOU HONESTLY STAND UP IN A COURT ROOM AND STATE YOU DON'T OWE ME MONEY.

NO,NO,NO JEAN LOUIS NO YOU COULD NOT.

SO I WILL CONTINUE TO PURSUE YOU AND YOUR COMPANY AS LONG AS IT TAKES FOR YOU TO BE HONEST AND RETURN MY MONEY.

IN DUE COURSE THIS WEBSITE WILL GO MULTI-LANGUAGE, JUST LIKE YOURS, SO THIS MESSAGE WILL GO OUT FURTHER AND HOPEFULLY MORE PEOPLE WILL SEE THE POSITION THAT YOUR ACTION HAVE PLACED ME IN.

HERE IN ENGLAND WE HAVE A PHRASE

"HONESTY IS THE BEST POLICY"

SO JEAN-LOUIS & OVOCONCEPT-SARL BE HONEST AND REPAY ME AND PUT ME BACK IN A POSITION WHERE I WAS, BEFORE YOUR DECIDED NOT TO REPAY WHAT YOU OWE ME.

youtube video coming very soon of show 

Dear Mr Chisholm,

We are writing to you again as counsel to Ovoconcept in the matter of your dispute with our client further to a new, recent incident at the Pig & Poultry show that took place on 10 and 11 May last in the United Kingdom.

Late in the morning of the first day, you went to Ovoconcept’s stand and asked to talk to Mr. Jean-Louis Lezoraine. After being told he was not there, you told Ovoconcept’s Ms. Céline Rousseau that you did not care about the letters of formal notice that we sent you and you loudly accused Ovoconcept of being “dishonest”. You also shouted that you wanted your money back several times, so that everyone around might hear.

The incident lasted several minutes until the show’s security service asked you to leave, which shows you were behaving outrageously.

You returned to Ovoconcept’s stand a few minutes later, however, as its staff were busy talking to customers. In spite of your offensive attitude, Ms. Céline Rousseau agreed to talk with your wife Julie.

Then, you told her you would contact Mr. Lezoraine on the telephone – which you did, in order to threaten him further. Lastly, you told Ms. Rousseau you were now retired and that you therefore had plenty of time to harm Ovoconcept and to visit all trade shows it might attend in order to continue your harassment campaign.

In light of that unacceptable behaviour, which was so outrageous that the show’s security service had to intervene, we hereby again give you formal notice to cease and desist immediately from all defamatory and disparaging comments against Ovoconcept, especially at trade shows and events that Ovoconcept rightfully attends for business purposes.

Please note that we have filed a criminal complaint in France on grounds of your behaviour and that our client reserves the right to initiate proceedings in the United Kingdom should you repeat your actions of 10 May last.

Yours faithfully,

Jérôme Rousselle

Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Collaborateur senior/Senior associate

THE WORLD OF OVOCONCEPT IS COMING TO YOU.THE FAIRTRADE EGG COMPANY DECIDED THREE YEARS AGO TO EXPAND ITS OPERATIONS IN TO THE DUCK EGG BUSINESS.WE WERE WELL AHEAD OF OUR MAIN COMPETITORS.

ONE AIM WAS TO PROCESS LIQUID EGG BOTH HEN AND DUCK AIMING FOR THE HIGH END MARKET PLACE.


THIS IS MY STORY

OVOCONCEPT SARL FRANCE WAS CHOSEN AS SUPPLIER OF OUR LIQUID EGG PROCESSING PLANT.

FULL FUNDS WERE PAID TO OVOCONCEPT SARL FOR THE EQUIPMENT.OVOCONCEPT WANTED FULL PAYMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF THE EQUIPMENT BEFORE IT RELEASED THE EQUIPMENT AND DELIVERED THE EQUIPMENT TO THE UK. THIS WAS MONTHS BEFORE WE WOULD BE IN A POSITION TO HAVE THE LINE INSTALLED. THIS WAS DUE TO THE FACT WE WERE STILL CONSTRUCTING THE BUILDING FOR IT TO GO IN.

AGAINST MY BETTER JUDGEMENT I PAID FOR THE INSTALLATION

1. BEFORE OVOCONCEPT SARL RELEASED THE EQUIPMENT WHICH HAD ALREADY BEEN PAID FOR.

2. IT IS NORMAL BUSINESS PRACTICE TO PAY FOR INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT AFTER IT IS INSTALLED.

DUE TO EVENTS OUTSIDE MY CONTROL I WAS FORCED TO SHUT DOWN THE FARMING OPERATION

THIS MATTER IS SUBJECT TO LEGAL PROCEEDING AND IS IN THE HANDS OF MY LAWYERS.

AS A RESULT OF CLOSING DOWN THE FARM AND TAKING THE DECISION NOT TO GO AHEAD WITH THE PLANNED PROCESSING LINE, OVOCONCEPT SARL WAS ASKED BY MR BARRY JACKSON THERE UK AGENT TO REFUND THE INSTALLATION MONEY.

MY UNDERSTANDING FROM MR JACKSON WAS THAT WAS OK WITH OVOCONCEPT.

THIS WAS BACK IN SEPTEMBER 2014.

IN MANY CONVERSATIONS, OVER THE FOLLOWING 12 MONTHS,WITH MR JACKSON, OVOCONCEPT HAD ASKED TO BUY THE EQUIPMENT BACK.

IN TURN I ASKED FOR THEM TO MAKE AN OFFER, THIS WAS NOT FOURTH COMING.

OVER THE MANY CONVERSATIONS WITH MR JACKSON I REPEATED THE NEED FOR OVOCONCEPT SARL TO REFUND THE MONIES DUE TO ME.

THIS DID NOT HAPPEN.

THIS HAS CAUSED BOTH MENTAL STRESS AND FINANCIAL DIFFICULTIES THAT HAVE HAD A DIRECT EFFECT ON MY CREDIT STATUS.

IN AUGUST 2015 I HAD HAD ENOUGH OF WHAT CAN ONLY BE DESCRIBED AS, PLAYING ME ALONG, WITH WHAT I CONCLUDED AS OVOCONCEPT HAD NO INTENTION OF REFUNDING THE MONEY THAT BELONGS TO ME.

I GAVE OVOCONCEPT A DEADLINE TO REFUND THE MONIES TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE FACT THE EURO WAS ABOUT 1.40 TO THE UK STIRLING WHEN THE ORIGINAL DEAL WAS DONE AND THAT THE EURO WAS NOW ABOUT 1.12 TO UK STIRLING.

WHEN I FIRST ASKED FOR A REFUND THE EURO WAS STILL THE SAME 1.40 TO THE POUND.

THE DEADLINE WAS IGNORED BY JEAN-LOUIS LEZORAINE OWNER OF OVOCONCEPT SARL ,AND HE WENT ON HOLIDAY, I BELIEVE FOR ONE MONTH.

FOLLOWING MANY CONVERSATIONS WITH OVOCONCEPT AND MR JACKSON OFFERS HAVE BEEN MADE AND RETRACTED. AT ONE POINT JEAN-LOUIS LEZORAINE OFFERED 3000 EUROS AND TOLD ME THAT BY SETTING UP OVOCONCEPT.CO.UK I WAS NOT BEING FAIR.AT THE END OF THE CONVERSATION AND A FULL FRANK DISCUSSION ABOUT WHAT FAIR ACTUALLY MEANT HE INCREASED HIS OFFER TO 7000 EUROS.

BOTH OFFERS DO NOT EVEN MEET WHAT WAS ACTUALLY PAID OVER TO OVOCONCEPT AND DO NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE EXCHANGE RATE DIFFERENCE AT THE POINT WHEN THE REFUND SHOULD HAVE BEEN GIVEN OR ANY INTEREST ON THE MONEY OR ANY OTHER LOSSES I HAVE INCURRED.

MR BARRY JACKSON AT ONE POINT TRIED TO BROKER A DEAL THAT OVOCONCEPT REFUND £80000 AND PURCHASE THE EQUIPMENT BACK.

THIS I BELIEVE IS BECAUSE HE HAD A BUYER FOR £100K AND OVOCONCEPT WOULD COME OUT IN FRONT.

I WOULD NOT.

SINCE THEN OVOCONCEPT CHANGED ITS MIND AGAIN AND BROUGHT IN LAWYERS.

THE LAWYERS HAVE DEMANDED I REMOVE THIS WEBSITE CLOSE AND REMOVE THE LIMITED COMPANY IN THE UK,WHICH I NOW OWN AND COMPLY WITH UK LAW.

IF I DO NOT I AM ACCUSED OF BLACKMAILING OVOCONCEPT.

SORRY I THOUGHT I WAS EMBARRASSING OVOCONCEPT BECAUSE OF ITS UNFAIR TREATMENT OF ME.

FREEDOM OF SPEECH TO LET OTHERS KNOW OF THE PROBLEMS I AM HAVING WITH OVOCONCEPT IS NOT A CRIME.


I SET OVOCONCEPT AND ITS LAWYERS A DEADLINE ( AS THEY HAVE GIVEN ME MANY) TO REFUND WHAT I'M DUE AND ASKED FOR COMPENSATION FOR MY LOSSES.

I'M TOLD BY THEM I WILL FACE CRIMINAL PROCEEDING FOR BLACKMAIL FOR ASKING FOR MY MONEY BACK.


FREEDOM OF SPEECH I CONCLUDE MUST MEAN SOMETHING TOTALLY DIFFERENT IN FRANCE, WHEN ALL I EVER WANTED WAS OVOCONCEPT TO REFUND WHAT WAS RIGHTFULLY DUE TO ME.

SO JEAN-LOUIS LEZORAINE AND ALL AT OVOCONCEPT SARL HAPPY NEW YEAR AND I AWAIT TO SEE IF YOU WILL REFUND THE MONIES THAT ARE DUE TO ME.

It's now the 1st February and still no word from the French and no sign of a refund of my money.


8TH MARCH


SPRING IS HERE AND STILL NO WORD FROM OVOCONCEPT-SARL ABOUT REFUNDING THE MONIES THAT ARE DUE TO ME.

HOWEVER SINCE ALL THE HOT AIR FROM THERE LAWYERS LAST YEAR, WITH ALL THE THREATS OF SUING ME AND HAVING ME CHARGED WITH BLACKMAIL, IT APPEARS JEAN LOUIS, THAT HAS RUN OUT OF STEAM.

OR WAS THAT, YOUR WAY OF TRYING TO FRIGHTEN ME OFF, SO YOU DID NOT HAVE TO REFUND THE MONEY THAT YOU OWE ME.

IT LOOKS LIKE THAT TO ME, THAT IT WAS YOUR WAY OF NOT PAYING ME BACK WHAT IS RIGHTFULLY MINE.

SO BY NOT REFUNDING ME FROM THE OUTSET JEAN-LOUIS THAT WOULD SEEM YOU HAD NO INTENTION TO REFUND ME.

SO YOUR THREATS OF BLACKMAIL BY ME SEEM IRRELEVANT, WHEN ALL I ASKED WAS FOR MY MONEY BACK.

SO IF I WAS BLACKMAILING YOU, WHAT DOES THAT MAKE YOU, WHEN YOU SAY ONE MINUTE, YOU ARE GOING TO REFUND ME AND THE NEXT YOU WILL NOT?

IN MY OPINION

IT JUST SUGGUSTS YOUR A PETTY CRIMINAL, HIDING BEHIND LAWYERS, THAT OWES MONEY, AND RUNS   A COMPANY NOT TO BE TRUSTED TO DO BUSINESS WITH.

BUT WHO I AM TO SUGGEST THAT? THE MAN THAT'S OWED MONEY BY YOU FOR TWO YEARS.

SO ARE YOU OR YOUR LAWYERS GOING TO COME BACK NOW AND ACCUSE ME AGAIN OF BLACKMAIL THREATENING YOU OR JUST ASKING FOR MY MONEY BACK THAT DOES BELONG TO ME?

LET THE WORLD SEE WHAT YOU AND YOUR COMPANY REALLY ARE, BUT OF COURSE YOU COULD PAY ME BACK.


MARCH 25TH

IT'S EASTER, CHRISTMAS HAS COME AND GONE AND THREE MONTHS LATER NOT A WORD FROM OVOCONCEPT OR IT'S LAWYERS. 

STILL WAITING FOR MY REFUND THAT'S WELL OVER DUE.

SO A WARNING TO ANYONE THINKING OF TRADING WITH OVOCONCEPT-SARL, IN MY OPINION THEY ARE NOT A COMPANY TO TRUST. HAPPY EASTER.